Most recent edit on 2007-01-12 16:58:16 by CyrilleDamez

Additions:
Living tissues usually have less sharp features than minerals. Therefore, to get a more organic-looking result when you are using an Emboss filter, use a Blur filter parametrised by the same FXMap or the same FXFilter to FXMap.

Deletions:
To get a more organic-looking result when you are using an Emboss filter, use a Blur filter parametrised by the same FXMap or the same FXFilter to FXMap. Living tissues usually have less sharp features than minerals :)



Edited on 2007-01-12 16:57:20 by CyrilleDamez

Additions:
To get a more organic-looking result when you are using an Emboss filter, use a Blur filter parametrised by the same FXMap or the same FXFilter to FXMap. Living tissues usually have less sharp features than minerals :)

Deletions:
To get a more organic-looking result when you are using an Emboss filter, use a Blur filter parametrised by the same FXMap or the same FXFilter to FXMap.



Edited on 2007-01-12 16:55:55 by CyrilleDamez

Additions:
To get a more organic-looking result when you are using an Emboss filter, use a Blur filter parametrised by the same FXMap or the same FXFilter to FXMap.

Deletions:
To get a more organic result when you are using a Emboss filter use a Blur filter parametrised by the same FXMap or the same FXFilter to FXMap.



Edited on 2006-11-10 14:47:40 by GillesFleury

Additions:
To get a more organic result when you are using a Emboss filter use a Blur filter parametrised by the same FXMap or the same FXFilter to FXMap.

Deletions:
To get a more organic result when you are using a Emboss filter use a Blur filter parametrised by the same FXMap or the same FX Filter to FX Map.



Oldest known version of this page was edited on 2006-11-10 14:45:47 by GillesFleury []
Page view:
To get a more organic result when you are using a Emboss filter use a Blur filter parametrised by the same FXMap or the same FX Filter to FX Map.
Page was generated in 0.1734 seconds